Primary Navigation

Social Navigation

Three-Watch Collection Under $5,000: Caleb Liam’s Picks

Three-Watch Collection Under $5,000: Caleb Liam’s Picks

Watch Factoryif

After somewhat of a break, half a month ago we re-commenced our Three-Watch Collection Under $5,000 arrangement with Zach Kazan’s take on the challenge. This week we go to Worn & Wound’s most current benefactor, Caleb Liam, for his three options.

To help you to remember the challenge, our scholars should pick three watches at or under a combined $5,000 value point they would theoretically keep as their lasting assortment. $5,000 dollars is regularly seen as the section point into the extravagance market, so the cap permits our group to get imaginative in bringing together three worth driven models to build up a balanced assortment to suit their necessities. All the watches picked are recorded at their MSRP or, for vintage and ceased models, at their run of the mill range in the market.


somewhat about me: I’m a straightforward man with basic tastes.

Being young and living outside of New York City, I function as a writer— which you may have guessed by reading this article — and marketing specialist, frequently on tight cutoff times and paying specific regard for hours spent and words composed. In my available energy, I’m dynamic, frequently running, hiking, playing sports, lifting weights, and so forth I like to heat bread, I travel a couple of times each year, I’m an eager peruser, and a beautiful average guitar player.

Approaching this brief, I began reflecting somewhat on my notable way to deal with watch collecting, trying to figure out what sort of three-piece assortment I would be happy with. In my sharp perceptions of my every day propensities, it turns out I normally possibly wear around three watches in any case in any event, when my assortment is a lot larger, with the models roughly split between three categories: a day by day wearer, a legitimate games watch (e.g. a blender I can really play sports in), and a more formal piece.  

Going somewhat more profound, I understood the games watch ought to have a chronograph and would ideally be digital (I’m sure you definitely realize which brand I’m gearing towards), the every day wearer ought to have the option to be found door jambs without me needing to stress a lot over its prosperity, and the more conventional piece ought to be unmistakable enough to elegantly stick out while wearing a suit just as inconspicuous enough to upgrade a more easygoing outfit. Less significant, yet pertinent, each ought to have a date show to hold me back from looking at my telephone like clockwork when I forget which day it is.

With this, I present to you my decisions.

G-SHOCK GWM5610-1 – $140

For all the time I spend in circumstances where I’m generally looking to establish a positive connection, around multiple times additional time I burn through alone at my work area or in a gym working against a clock. Therefore, I need a solid multi-work sports watch ready to consistently change between the two, providing me with a universally handy mixer to require on every day. The watch ought to critically have a chronograph, a quartz development with long battery life, a digital presentation, a solid case development with significant water opposition, and ought to be comfortable to wear. With these prerequisites, a G-SHOCK GWM5610-1 is a conspicuous decision, showcasing every one of these highlights and more inside a natural square case.

Outside of usefulness, the GWM5610-1 uses a notorious G-SHOCK design recalling the original DW-5000C initially delivered in 1983, which strikes at the center of my design inclinations in vintage-impacted present day watches. Further, the watch is an especially esteem driven model, being just $140 for what is, as I would like to think, probably the greatest game watches ever invented.


Seiko Prospex SPB079 – $850

My next decision is my every day wearer, for which the Seiko Prospex SPB079 would handily fill this job. For those new, the SPB079 was one of the more sizzling dive arrivals of 2018, which alongside the SPB077 (which selects a metal arm band and dark bezel), is a cutting edge take on the authentic ref. 6159 expert diver Seiko delivered in 1968.

Since its delivery, the moderately new watch has been inconceivably mainstream, most quite for its all around measured 44-mm case (which really wears slightly more modest on the wrist), unfathomably appealing blue bezel and matte dark dial combination, and dependable type 6R15 development with a 50-hour power hold. As far as I might be concerned, the SPB079 is a great decision for every one of these reasons, notwithstanding its hour long bezel which the two fills a double need of protecting the watch from unavoidable knocks and as another strategy for tracking hours while I’m occupied at work area diving.


Rolex Datejust 1601 — $3,000 – $4,000

Seeing as my initial two watches are altogether under $1,000, you might be wondering what I would pick with the remaining $4,000 to balance my assortment. I realized the watch must be something vintage and more formal, and with most different watches at the forefront of my thoughts fairly over my remaining budget, I decided on the Rolex Datejust 1601 (images through Analog/Shift ).

1601s are accessible in a wide range of materials and colorways, each with different highlights depending on the particular model and the year it was delivered. By and by, I love the styling of full steel 1601s, and how effectively the watch can rotate from a dressier commitment to a more easygoing games model depending on the band it’s tied on and the outfit it’s a piece of. Furthermore, for shading, I truly love the blue wide kid and cloth sigma dial models, yet I would likewise be more than content with a more straightforward silver dial alternative and an assortment of lashes to put it on.

Prices for 1601s can vary generally depending on condition, request, and extraordinariness, yet you can sensibly hope to pay somewhere close to $3,000 – $4,000 for a strong model from a respectable seller. Similarly as with all watch buying, though especially vintage Rolex collecting, ensure you’re working with a legitimate source to best guarantee authenticity.


Am I 100% positive about these decisions? No. In any case, I feel that between the three models I’ve chose I would have an adaptable and interesting assortment more than equipped for keeping me glad for an all-inclusive timeframe. What’s more, more critically than this, in the wake of having utilized the better piece of the previous week and half to think about my decisions, I’m sure enough to say I presently don’t have any desire to consider this subject in case I change my psyche again.