Primary Navigation

Social Navigation

Review: Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight

Review: Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight


Tudor has a talent for taking the spotlight at Baselworld. In the course of the most recent couple of years, the consistent pattern of media reporting appears to consistently begin with Tudor — maybe through a “leaked” secret or a pre-Basel party just before the show — and afterward it comes back to Tudor when online journals, for example, yours really, distribute wrap-ups, round-ups and best-ofs for the occasion. 2018 was the same — truth be told, it might have been Tudor’s most grounded year yet.

The first rush of information to hit was that Tudor had dispatched a GMT Black Bay ( read our survey here ). It was an intelligent subsequent stage for the brand and the Black Bay line. And afterward came the subsequent wave. The bits of gossip sounded wrong from the outset — practically like they were unrealistic. Could Tudor truly have delivered a 39-millimeter Black Bay with a bezel? Certainly, they had just done more modest, non-bezel assortments, yet to make a more modest, bezeled Black Bay appeared to be impossible. That is to say, by then wouldn’t it be almost at vintage Submariner extents? Furthermore, on the off chance that they did make it, what development could they use? Most likely not an in-house development, I thought. All things considered, the first Black Bay and Pelagos really got a touch thicker when they changed from ETA to in-house, recommending that Tudor’s developments are genuinely sizable. I inferred that the gossipy tidbits were wrong.

And at that point, a lot to my charming shock, I was some unacceptable one. The new watch, named the Black Bay Fifty-Eight, was a lot of genuine, and it was truly only 39 millimeters in distance across with another, more modest, in-house type. It additionally accompanied a more shopper agreeable sticker price, costing about $100 not as much as its more seasoned, bigger siblings.

While the distance across just shrunk 2 millimeters, the remainder of the characterizing measurements descended relatively too. The drags went from 22 to 20 millimeters, and the carry to-haul went from 50 to 47.75 millimeters, and, maybe in particular, the thickness dropped from 14.8 to 11.9 millimeters. The final product is a watch that wears altogether contrastingly and looks more like its vintage progenitors, along these lines freeing the Black Bay line up to a considerably more extensive gathering of lovers and clients. Obviously, you’re perusing this in 2019, and this is all old news as of now.

Today, somewhat under a year since it was revealed, yet a couple of months after it initially hit racks, we’re giving the watch a legitimate survey. Is this the Black Bay we had always wanted? Is it the everyman’s and woman’s Submariner? A Sub for another age and another age? Would this be able to assist us with getting our aggregate dissatisfaction at having not repurchased a vintage Tudor Sub when they were all the more sensibly valued? Let’s find out.


Review: Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight

Case Stainless Steel Movement Tudor MT5402 Dial Black Lume Yes Lens Domed Sapphire Strap Steel Bracelet Water Resistance 200m Dimensions 39 x 47.75mm Thickness 11.9mm Lug Width 20mm Crown Screw-down Warranty Yes Price $3575


The Black Bay Fifty-Eight (I’ll consider it the BB58 going ahead for brevity’s purpose) simply looks right here and there the wrist. It’s more modest, yet it’s not small, and it holds the entirety of the smart, energetic appeal that Black Bays (and Submariners besides) are known for having. Estimating 39 x 47.75 x 11.9 millimeters, the case hits a sweet spot for a compact game/plunge watch. We’ve been seeing increasingly more 39-millimeter watches, and it’s a size that appears to function admirably for watches with and without bezels. That’s significantly more evident when there is a bigger choice for those of us who lean toward a beefier watch with more presence, similar to the case here.

As I composed above, it’s less the breadth that is important here, and it’s more about the general extents of the watch. It’s not as long drag to-carry, so the case fixates better on a more modest wrist. The measurement here is gotten, however the dial-to-bezel extents have been changed (supposedly) by expanding the overall size of the dial opening. This permits the watch to get more modest without looking much smaller.

But the genuine story here, and it’s what has the greatest effect, is the thickness. Coming in at a hair under 12 millimeters, the case thickness is ideal for a jumper. It’s not going to win any honors for being the most slender jump watch, yet it’s making an effort not to. It’s still an instrument watch with a rough appeal, yet it’s not, at this point cumbersome. Additionally, it looks slender on the grounds that the mid-case here isn’t a square of cleaned steel. The general thickness is separated all the more equally among the case-back, mid-case, bezel, and crystal.

Look at those cleaned slants Big, yet not very large, crown The shaded cylinder is gone

This carries me to a significant point: it’s not unreasonably the first Black Bay (BB41 from now on) is too huge; 41 millimeters across is well inside present day assumptions. Nor is the issue that it is excessively tall; there are a lot of different watches pushing 15 millimeters in thickness. The issue is that it wears tall. Different watches, including the BB58, shrewdly shroud their stature through plan, and accordingly read more modest on the wrist (this is something we talk about a ton on W&W). The BB41 doesn’t do this, and thus, it would appear that a cleaned tower on the wrist. From over, the size is attractive, rough, and peruses well on both huge and little wrists. From the side, in any case, it looks unrefined. 

Tudor endeavored to address this with the BB41 GMT by adding another incline along the lower part of the case, which helped a piece. In any case, the most genuine fix to this issue is a more slender case, and the BB58 does it right.

A more ignored, yet at the same time critical, change to the BB58 is that the hauls are currently 20 millimeters down from 22. This has an enormous generally effect in look and feel of the watch. 22-millimeter lashes are wide, and 22-millimeter drags are wide. They added to the generally solid, oppressive presence that the BB41 has on the wrist. With 20-millimeter drags, the BB58 has a lighter presence around the wrist. This doesn’t compare to a less manly look, mind you, yet one that is unquestionably more quelled. For my wrist, it’s very much wanted as I in a real sense think that its more comfortable. I’ll get to the wristband in detail later, however I’ll note since it tightens from 20 millimeters down to 16, which assumes a major part in the BB58 wearing just as it does. 

As for the plan, in the event that you’ve seen a Black Bay previously, you shouldn’t have any amazements. It holds similar bends, shape, completing, and so on The brushing on the highest point of the carries is as yet outstanding, similar to the sharp angle that cuts around the edge of the case. The sides are as yet cleaned, which is with regards to the Sub-plan language. Be that as it may, given the measure of deviation the Black Bay has from vintage models, I’d love to see a brushed variant sooner or later.

The bezel actually looks exceptionally pleasant, however it’s still somewhat tricky since there is no shade like on the Pelagos. All things considered, the 60-click system feels right on the money when turning, it actually has that cool small bolting instrument at 0/60 where it requires a touch more exertion to turn at that spot.

The crown is still “big” comparative with the case, yet it doesn’t feel as misrepresented. It’s endorsed with a huge Tudor Rose logo, same as on the BB41, and it is an outwardly engaging gesture to vintage Tudor. One thing it’s lacking, nonetheless, is the shaded crown tube. This was kind of a mark of the Black Bay, yet one that was constantly met with a tepid reaction. It didn’t ruin anything, however it didn’t truly add anything to the watch all things considered. I never abhorred it, however I likewise don’t miss it on the BB58.


Even more than the case, the dial of the BB58 is unadulterated Black Bay. Tudor has a recipe, and they don’t stray from it here. Indeed, it’s fundamentally a somewhat downsized rendition of the Black Bay Black dial I two or three years prior (read that survey here ). The dial surface is matte dark and looks a touch blurred to my eyes. Tudor says the dial is domed, so I accept it’s domed, however the impact is exceptionally unobtrusive. Maybe there is a bit of arch to be seen at the edge of the dial and I’m simply missing it.

On the surface, you have the obvious Submariner-style hour markers composed of lume-filled, rose gold appliqués. The lume is likewise that equivalent warm custard shading that is sufficiently distant white to not look excessively new, yet without looking like fake patina. Around the edge of the dial is a shut file of hash marks for the minutes/seconds delivered in an artificial rose gold print. In the middle, you have the logo under 12 and the profundity rating in addition to chronometer text over 6. The hands are the staple “snowflake” set completed in cleaned rose gold. To be honest, the lone distinction I can see here from the BB41 is that the dial printing may draw a touch nearer to the edge, as demonstrated by the more clouded “Swiss Made” text under 6.

The glow from the gold is striking The work of art, strong markers are in every case simple to peruse Beautiful reflections

Though I once disagreed with the snowflake hour hand being blended in with round markers, following a couple of long stretches of seeing Black Bays around, I just don’t care any longer. I actually think the handset looks better with square markers (à la the Pelagos), yet I’ve become acclimated to it with no guarantees. It’s not really hostile and, given the accomplishment of the line, it’s becoming its own thing. You win, Tudor. On the BB58, the hands look incredible and take care of their work of encouraging you tell the time quickly.

While the dial remains generally the equivalent, the bezel has a slight corrective change that makes this first form of the BB58 novel in the assortment. The addition is dark, anodized aluminum and highlights a red triangle at 0/60 with a lume pearl, much the same as it does on the BB41 Black. Yet, rather than crude aluminum for the numerals and markings, Tudor went with rose gold to coordinate the dial embeds. The outcome is a respectable sum more gold being added to the image, yet not all that much. It fundamentally falls some place in the middle of the Black Bay Black and Tudor’s two-tone models. Consider this one two-tone light.

While I’ve seen some contradiction about this move, and even in the W&W office not every person is on the same wavelength, but rather I think it’s incredible. I’ve come to truly like gold/overlaid complements on game watches. I’m not going to go full gold any time soon, yet I do appreciate a dash of that warm tone coming off a watch. It causes a watch to feel less unmistakably present day while not explicitly going for a vintage curve. On the BB58, it makes the gold accents of the dial leap out a touch more, and the general bundle more style than sport centered. As the debut BB58, this likewise causes it to feel more special.

The 79090 and the Black Bay Fifty-Eight


The story of the BB58 doesn’t stop with the more modest case, which is actually an entryway to something more huge. The BB58 is controlled by an entirely different type, the MT5402. Including similar specialized specs as its greater, more established sibling (the MT5602 highlighted during the BB41s), the MT5402 is a COSC-confirmed chronometer with a 70-hour power save, silicon hairspring, free-sprung balance, 27 gems, a recurrence of 28,800 bph, and a bidirectional winding rotor. The thing that matters is basically the size.

But this isn’t the instance of simply a more modest base plate; it’s actually an entirely different development, presently estimating 26 x 4.99 millimeters against the 31.8 x 6.5 millimeters of the more seasoned type. That’s an enormous contrast and it’s what permits Tudor to pull off the more modest, more slender case. For reference, the ETA 2824-2 is 25.6 x 4.6 millimeters, so the new development is substantially more in accordance with that industry staple.

In my experience with the BB58, it was incredibly precise and showed no force save issues. Truth be told, I was charmed to think that its actually ticking and exactly on schedule two or three days of not wearing it. On a timegrapher, the outcomes were amazing. Given that my utilization of that device is novice, best case scenario, I won’t distribute the outcomes, however let’s simply say they were well inside spec.

I think you can’t truly belittle what a major move the BB58 is for Tudor. It’s not simply an incredible watch that fulfills a profound longing for a more vintage-feeling, Submariner-motivated watch by the house with real rights to the name (Hans Wildorf Group), it’s an entirely different stage for the brand. This isn’t going to be a one-and-done circumstance. In addition to the fact that they invested in the tooling for the entirety of the case, dial, and arm band components for the watch, yet they did as such for the development too. Also, the previous doesn’t even compare to the meaning of the last mentioned. This development is probably going to clear out what’s left of ETA from the brand, which makes them autonomous from Swatch gathering, however now sets Tudor as the $3,000 – $5,000 stalwart they need to be. To paraphrase Walter White, they are in the realm business.

Bracelet and Wearability

The bolt wristband that Tudor acquainted with the Black Bay line in 2016 truly completed the throwback picture of the watch, so I was happy to see that they dispatched the BB58 with a 20-millimeter adaptation. While there are calfskin and texture choices for the watch, the arm band is the correct decision. With respect to the subtleties, it’s precisely what you anticipate. The wristband is 20 millimeters at the drags, and it tightens in strides to 16 millimeters. Each connection highlights bolt plated sides, with the removable connections dropping one bolt for a screw-bar. It’s a savvy detail since it the two looks great and takes into consideration simple estimating at home. The catch is a strong, all around completed, overlap over fasten with an auxiliary lock that makes a Tudor Shield shape.

And now for the main part — how it wears. Does the distinction in size have that huge of an effect on the wrist? The appropriate response is an audacious yes. The new case improves things significantly. The BB58 is smooth and compact, yet at the same time toolish and manly. None of the roughness of the BB41 has been lost, and the vintage beguile has just been intensified. Furthermore, the watch is only straight-up comfortable. There’s no catching on my sleeve, no weakness before the day’s over, no off-kilter squeezing while at the same time sitting at my work area and composing. It’s precisely as I need it to be.

Granted, I incline toward more modest, more slender watches as a rule. As my wrist wavers around 7 inches and isn’t expansive, I find more limited drag to-haul lengths and widths from 36 – 40 millimeters ideal. All things considered, glancing back at photographs of the BB41 on my wrist, I can’t say that that watch looked terrible. Greater, maybe a touch bolder, yet not curiously large. The BB58 is more about its unpretentious extents. It’s not stretching my boundaries. It sits focused on my wrist, which takes into account a greater amount of the arm band to be obvious from above. Eventually, it’s truly simply a question of inclination, and Tudor currently has great choices for various tastes.

Black Bay Fifty-Eight: 39.5mm Black Bay Black: 41mm And one more for best of luck

Of course, the other factor is vintage-ness. The Black Bay is important for Tudors legacy line so it’s intended to address vintage Tudor Submariners, and Tudor has assembled its prosperity to a great extent off of the rising ubiquity of vintage watches as a rule. The BB41 had the looks, yet not the scale. The BB58 closely resembles a vintage Submariner. As vintage costs keep on going up, the BB58 gives an extraordinary option — and not simply as far as feel. It’s apparently the more intelligent buy given the advanced form and specs.


It’s not frequently that a brand takes something incredible and makes it shockingly better, yet that’s precisely how Tudor managed the BB58. The Black Bay arrangement was at that point demonstrated and uncontrollably fruitful. While more up to date varieties of the BB41 appeared with maybe less exhibition than early forms (likely an indication of slight weakness or an excessive number of alternatives), the Black Bay was all things considered on target to become a famous watch in its own right. With the BB58, Tudor dropped the mic. They took the entirety of the criticizable components of the BB41, fixed them, and added a totally different in-house type in with the general mish-mash. With the two sizes being accessible (and in fact there’s one bigger variation as the 43-millimeter bronze case, also the bezel-less models) they have everybody covered now.

And that implies everybody needs to get one! I’m joking, obviously, yet Tudor is absolutely making it harder to oppose, particularly since Tudor additionally dropped the cost on the BB58 by $100 dollars (compared to the BB41) to $3,575. What’s more, that’s not in any event, thinking about the cost for used models, which will be considerably seriously enticing. Maybe the value distinction represents the expense of saved steel, yet it’s more probable an essential decision to be significantly more competitive. Tudor truly is attempting to possess the $3,000 – $5,000 space, and the way that their most mainstream watch is nearer to $3,000 than $5,000 while wearing an in-house type is savvy. We’ve previously seen the business respond with any semblance of Omega, IWC, Panerai, and Baume and Mercier offering in-house models under $5,000.

What’s left to say? It’s clear Tudor did great with the BB58, and it’s likely they will grow extraordinarily on the assortment. This implies more alternatives, clearly, yet maybe additionally better used costs on this first form, which is kind of a shared benefit on the off chance that you have some tolerance. For my preferences, this model, with its saved utilization of gold, may consistently be my favorite.  Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight